In this essay I will explain my
viewpoint on root problems and real solutions using knowledge I gained
through research including Mark Passio's talk on Natural Law, Free Will
and Personal Responsibility, which incorporates the concept of balancing
the masculine and feminine through Care, Knowledge, and Courage
(Emotions, Thoughts, Actions = Trinity). These concepts will also
address the issue of Unjust Laws, which manifests in tyrannical
government edicts like The War on Drugs. One of the examples I will use
will be the the much discussed problems in the black and minority
community and why these problems persist and continue to get worse, not
better. My contention: Taking away moral agency, which is a tenant of
Natural Law that people make choices and act out behaviors because every
person possess Free Will, implies that blacks and minorities are unable
to succeed by their merit alone, and puts all the blame on external
factors such as Institutionalized Racism, White Privilege, and Cultural
Hegemony which is included in the dogma of Critical Race Theory.
The
working definition of Natural Law is "The body of universal, non
man-made, binding, and immutable Laws which act as the governing dynamic
for the consequences of human behavior (conscience)". This includes The
Non Regression Principle (Sacred Feminine and the Golden Rule) and the
principle that Freedom and Morality are directly proportional. The truth
of Natural Law is that there is Right and Wrong action, Good and Evil,
Moral and Immoral choices. Facts and principles are not subjective, but
objective and universal. To accept Natural Law as the First Principle
of the universe means that moral relativism is a erroneous belief. For
example, when you initiate violent action against another person and/or
their personal property and cause them harm you are violating the Non
Aggression Principle and behaving immorally. Behavior --> Was
something harmed? --> Yes --> What it yours? --> No --> That
is a Wrong Action. Behavior is the Action of Free Will.
Balance and harmony in the Macro (society, community) and Micro (Self)
levels of existence is the absence of contradiction between Emotions,
Thoughts and Actions. This is the balance between the Sacred Masculine
and Sacred Feminine, or the balance between the Left brain and Right
brain. When the two hemispheres are out of balance you see extremism in
Emotion, Thought and Actions.
When there are problems manifested in the world most
people can describe the symptoms and the "prison" in accurate detail.
They can tell you how it works very well, but they can't tell you why the problems are happening. When asked, "Why?"
there are incorrect answers and assumptions. In the case of the crime,
poverty, fatherlessness, family breakdown, and strife in the black
community the answer most people profess is "Systemic Racism" and
oppression by the "White Patriarchy", but that is not the root cause.
How do you solve a problem?
1)
Recognize that there IS a problem. Fear-based denial of the problem
must be first dealt with and conquered. Recognize change first starts at
the Micro (Self) level then aggregates into the Macro (Community,
Society) level. Recognizing a problem requires Self ReFlection ("to look
at again"), which includes pain, suffering, and and conscious thought.
The majority of the time, the problems that manifest in people's lives
are not due to external factors, but may lie within themselves and their
own immoral actions. This is having a "Conscience", which means "with
knowledge". There are no cop-outs or excuses for immoral
behavior. When one lives in fear-based denial one can have the mindset,
"I have suffered, so therefore I shall cause suffering." This may or may
not be a conscious thought, but it manifests in different mental and
physical ways. Cycles of systemic suffering and violence are caused by
Willful Ignorance with Knowledge and SelfReflection being the key to
correcting the cycle.
2)
Recognize the symptoms being displayed are merely effects of underlying
causes. Therefore, instead of simply trying to treat the symptoms, make
an accurate diagnosis. ("Dia" = through, by way of, "Gnosis" =
knowledge) We co-create our shared reality in the aggregate.
Individual choices either based in Harmony or opposition to Natural Law
influence the quality of the shared experience. This dynamic acts as a
perfect expression of the Principle of Correspondence: "As above, so
below. As below, so above." For a change to take place numbers are
required (majority of people that recognize, diagnose and treat the
problem).
3) Through knowledge acquired via accurate diagnosis, take required Action necessary to rectify the causal factors which led to the manifestation of the problem.
As
an example, how can "systemic racism" as a nebulous cause, especially
as defined in Critical Race Theory, be rectified to solve the literal causal
factors which led to the manifested Reality? As people say, Change
Starts at Home. How can diagnosing the problem as a Macro, "Racism", be
accurate? How can Critical Race Theory be a behavioral symptom when it
is a Theory (a Perception, not a Truth).
So,
what is Critical Race Theory? Critical Race Theory "recognizes that
racism is ingrained in the fabric and system of U.S. society. The
individual racist need not EXIST to note that institutional
racism is pervasive in the dominant culture." CRT came from Critical
Theory and Radical Feminism and borrows from such European philosophers
and radical Marxists such as Gramsci, Derrida, Reich, and Marcuse to
name a few. White Privilege is "white people, by virtue of the fact that
they are white have a privileged position in American Culture."
The three main hypotheses of Critical Race Theory:
1) Racism is ordinary, not aberrational. This falsely assumes that Evil (racism) is ordinary and the norm, not Good. Evil is not necessary. The only people who believe that Evil must exist in order for people to recognize the Good are self-loathing and lack self-respect. Claiming that racism is an ordinary state of experiencing life as a minority encourages blacks to distrust and blame whites. It caters to those who embrace only emotional rhetoric (Right Brain imbalance) and not empirical facts. Critical race theory also serves as a guilt mechanism for whites in order to extract apologies for "invisible" wrongs that they can not perceive due to "White Privilege".2) "Interest Convergence" is when racism advances the interests of both white "elites" and white "working class people" so large segments of society don't do anything to "eradicate" it. This is another false assumption based in a false Reality, for it again, generalizes a whole 'race' of people which is disingenuous and dangerous. This tenant of CRT is based on Gramsci's theory of Cultural Hegemony and belief in Historicism. Cultural Hegemony states that cultural values of the bourgeois are based on folklore, popular culture and religion, therefore those needed to be deconstructed and the the proletariat create their own separate culture. Historicism is the theory that the knowledge of the world is not derived from our relation to objective reality, but rather from social relations between the bearers of those concepts. As a result there is no such thing as "human nature" or "natural law", which segways to the third tenant:3) Race is a "social construction", which purports that race is a product of social "thought" and "relations", not objective, inherent, or fixed. Race corresponds to no biological or genetic reality. This last tenet completely obliterates the entire Left Brain Hemisphere (the Sacred Masculine) and is an example of extreme Right Brain (Feminine) Pathological Imbalance. There can be no truth or balance in a theory if one side of the Brain is completely ignored. For more reading on genetics and differences between race, refer to Taboo by John Entine and The Bell Curve by Charles Murray.
Nature versus Nurture? What is the nature of a human
being? That is akin to asking 'What is the nature of of a Coffee Pot?'
or 'What is the nature of a laptop computer?' Human nature is not
inherently Evil or Good, just like a coffee pot or laptop is not
inherently Evil or Good. Instead, we should consider the operating
conditions, or the environment in which human beings exist, which
influences behavior to a great extent, thus creating the 'human
condition'. We can use the analogy that human beings are similar to
computers, in that human beings are 'programmable'. Good in --> Good
out. Garbage in --> Garbage out. What gets put into a person's mind
via its environment (culture) becomes their programming and determines
behavior (output). If the human being has a erroneous "file system"
(traumatic childhood, harmful environment growing up during the
formative years), a bad "operating system" (culture), and a bad
"software program" (rigid and dogmatic beliefs), their "output"
(behavior) onto the "screen" of life will also be bad and will contribute to the deteriorating conditions on a mass scale. Like a
computer, the behavior of a human being will largely depend upon its
programming, which is the quality of the information put into it which
enables it to process and create efficiently.
So,
who is ultimately responsible, at fault, or deserving of blame for a
violation of the Non Aggression Principle and Natural Law which resulted
in the harm of others? When viewed in the perspective of Natural Law
and Behavior it becomes impossible to blame something like "White
Privilege", "Critical Race Theory", or "The Patriarchy" because those
concepts do not, and can not wield personal responsibility or moral culpability, and they never will. Personal responsibility lies
with the individual. For example, John Q decides to take heroin. By
taking heroin, John's behavior is not forced upon him by "racism" but by
personal choice. Choices have consequences. Now, we can not say
John's behavior is a violation of the Non Aggression Principle because
his choice to do heroin harms only himself, not others. You can argue
that if John abuses heroin that causes collateral damage by affecting
his family, relationships, and well being, but it is not the
initiation of Force. But if John physically abuses his son, that is the
initiation of Force against another person and that is morally Wrong. As
well, if John is high on heroin and steals or vandalizes someone else's
property, that in the initiation of Force and is morally Wrong. We can
have a discussion at a later time as to what Morally Right disciplinary
action should be taken with John to prevent him from initiating violence
on others.
Therefore,
what if the State puts John in a cage (jail) for breaking a "law" that
dictates that smoking Cannabis is illegal? Based on our example of John
we agree that by smoking Cannabis he is not violating the NAP so
being jailed for Cannabis is Morally Wrong. The State has the power to arbitrarily dictate punishments and enforce Morally Unjust laws, which
affect every citizen, not just blacks and minorities. So, the War on
Drugs and many other government laws are not Racist, but Morally
Unjust. Once one applies Natural Law and the NAP to problems, the causes
and effects become much clearer and easier to determine.
No comments:
Post a Comment